top of page
Logo _ bfac84.png
  • Jonathan Zu

The Titanic Aftermath of World War 1

Bertrand Russell once asserted “War does not determine who is right – only who is left.” 


The toll of World War I history remains lucid, and staggering-8 million lives lost, 21 million wounded, leading to the toppling of three empires, ultimately resulting in a global turmoil. World War I was an aberrant conflict spanning over from 1914 to 1918 in view of numerous triggers: Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism, Nationalism, and the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. World War I unfolded an unparalleled spectacle on a global magnitude, witnessing the formation of two major alliances: Central Powers, (Germany, Italy, and Austria-Hungary) and the Allied Powers (Great Britain, France, and Russia). The Central Powers and Allied Powers self-assured a victory and neglected the scope of the war, witnessing a global upheaval, grappling with economic and political obstacles. World War I expanded internationally, commencing from Europe to the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and eventually North America, marking a prominent trajectory in the course of human history. However, despite the cataclysm of the conflict, it fell short of recognizing the purpose of bringing an end to wars. Hence, World War I was undeniably a calamitous and ingenious conflict that altered the course beyond Europe on an international scope through the long-term aftermaths: demographic shift, the birth of the League of Nations, and economic modification. 


The European demographic shift illustrates the profound aftermath of World War I. No nation was prepared, neglecting the scope of the war, which unfurled its devastating impact, leaving scars across the continent as a whole. The postwar period ushered geopolitical shifts and marked a turning point for Europe. Its long-term aftermath echoed through the altered balance of women to men (15:1) in Europe. The innumerable sacrifices weren't merely a number; it was a wrenching loss, ripping the heart of European nations. The great war wiped out an entire generation of young men, ushering in arduous barriers. Essentially, the prominent consequence of the conflict dwindled the rate of reproduction. Numerous women found themselves without appropriate companions due to the annihilation of men, and in some instances, opted for solitary lives due to the enduring holocaust of the battle. Simultaneously, the prevailing impact on economic stability steadily escalated an atmosphere of doubt upon reproduction. Families, grappling with the economic and psychological scars from the Great War, abandoned their decisions regarding childbirth. The extensive consequence on economic memory drove the continent as a whole, to fade away from the idea of family expansion. The absence of forthcoming generations due to the declining reproduction, and the opportunity to address the emptiness of potential substantially diminished. For instance, the absence of farmers, and labourers was apparent considering the scope of the war, which echoed not just in fields and factories but in the continent’s heart. Before the conflict, the world rotated without acknowledging the endurance of farmers, workers, or soldiers, but the postwar era emphasizes the sorrowing globe acknowledging the vitality of every human being and their roles. The loss of workers was an existential crisis nationally and globally; European nations encountered devastation and desolation in measurable workplaces, specifically, the roles that were dominated by males. The cut in business formation restrained the continent from advancing and reconstructing. The European nations decided that a pivotal solvency had to be brought. The solvency was a turning chapter of global history, a moment where the necessity outweighed the societal norms of Europe. The prominent solvency was the involvement of women in workplaces. Historically, females were confined to limited roles and economic opportunities. Thus, the postwar period modified the global journey, by bringing females as the vital heroes of national resilience. Hence, the aftermath of World War I enabled the world to reflect and reconstruct the past. 


Additionally, in the wake of World War I, the League of Nations was institutionalized becoming the first worldwide, inter-governmental organization, established in early 1920. The destruction Europe encountered postwar had never been seen before. There was a sharp realization and a consensus between nation’s that another conflict of such great scale had to be prevented. American president Woodrow Wilson envisioned an impending doom, deeming it necessary to establish an international organization in hopes to rally the preservation of peace. The idea was quickly popularized by the British. Politicians found it so vital to be founded, that the Phillimore Committee was created under British Parliament. With the aim of understanding and exploring the concept, Parliament quickly announced public support. Aided by South African prime minister Jan Smuts, and Lord Robert Cecil of the United Kingdom, Wilson proposed the idea, titled “League of Nations” at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919. The structure and functionality of League was discussed among all nations in attendance of the conference, to come to a unanimous agreement. Following extensive negotiations, the League of Nations was soon established in Part I of the Treaty of Versailles, the binding peace treaty that put closure to World War I. With its home base in London for the first ten months, the organization eventually moved to Geneva, Switzerland. The League of Nations as an organization was officially established on January 10, 1920. However, the splendor proved to be short-lived. The League of Nations had been met with hindrance as soon as it was established. The nation like the United States, who held the president at the core of the organization's founding, refused to join. Congress challenged the idea, with republicans raising concerns in regards to budgetary issues, alarmed that the wealth committed to a global organization would trade off with funds already dedicated to building the country's national defense. In avoidance of tarnishing their reputation, League struggled to assert its authority, frequently refraining from supporting nations calls for help, frightened by the notion of potential failure. In just over a decade, Germany, Italy, and Japan, the pillar stones of the organization, promptly left, as fascist dictators took power, and reguided attention to establishing their own realms. By 1939, the once powerful institution that influenced peace, and encouraged discourse rather than gunshots on an international stage, was left as fragile as a fragile threat. Absent countries with the ability to sway nations on a global level, the League of Nations was left futile. Devoid of nations powerful enough to guide countries on a global scale, the increasing tensions ensured upcoming conflict. 


Ultimately, in the aftermath of World War I, the European economic landscape encountered a profound metamorphosis. The scarcity of assets was the driving force behind the economic downturn that cast a shadow upon Europe. Amidst the intricate aspect of post-war obstacles, the military readiness was a pivotal factor that emerged as architects of supply deficiency. The production lines that once teemed with vitality, churning out coal, steel, iron, and copper, bore the scars of wartime exploitation. The toll of conflict was the silent decline of the lifeblood enduring industry. For instance, the surge in demand escalated, creating a greater gap between need and availability. Furthermore, the absence of a workforce hindered global production. The death of numerous men who were employed in factories, along with the injuries sustained by those returning home, posed a significant difficulty to the revitalization of the industry. The constrained production resulted in no viable commodities for trade; European and North American nations grappled with insufficient manufacturing capacities, cutting global supply trade. Conversely, the end of the war marked the beginning of a new era, the age of industrialization. Vicious German tactics left a calamity on Allied soldiers, leaving an indelible impact. Conflict encouraged game-changing innovations: the shock of chemical warfare, unleashing poisons amid turmoil, blinding and deafening innumerable soldiers; the machine gun, shooting at an unprecedented speed; the turbine-powered Dreadnoughts, reshaping naval warfare; and the soaring dominance of mass-produced aircraft. These innovations triggered a global arms race, breathing life into technological advancements and forming the era of industrialization. Amidst recession, nations driven by the echoes of war, commenced arms production and warfare innovation to cast their militaries in conformity with the new norms forged in the great war. However, the initial aftermath of the war left entire nations in disarray, and the consequences of warfare on the ground were primarily seen in infrastructure, necessary for the livelihood of citizens. Governments in Europe now had to reconstruct their nation in virtually every aspect. Transportation, housing, waterlines, sewage, gas, and electricity, were just a few of a plethora of infrastructure destroyed in war that needed restoring. Without restoration, people were forced to live in shambles. Paired with a crippling economy, governments had to turn their focus to the socioeconomic position their citizens were in, which started with restoring their economy. With the development of new technologies, governments felt the urgency to ramp up militaries and advance them technologically. Simultaneously, while governments rebuilt their nations both infrastructure-wise, and economically, the arms race the world had installed on them conveyed an urgency to commence innovative advancements, and revitalize manufacturing of new technologies.


Hence, World War I left an indelible mark across Europe and beyond. The European demographic shift was a profound aftermath of World War I, where the ratio of women and men had significantly transformed due to the decimating impact of the conflict. As a result of profound transformation, the growth of future generations diminished, making the challenge of fulfilling workplaces even more prevalent. Thus, it marked the beginning of the involvement of women in workplaces that were once dominated by males, changing the course of history and reconstructing the past. Additionally, due to the prominent impact of World War I, the League of Nations was established on Woodrow Wilson’s 14 points in anticipation of mitigating future conflicts. Numerous nations affirmed and contributed, but the great powers, specifically the United States, negated, as congress voiced the issue of fiscal challenges. With fascist leaders taking over Italy, Germany, and Japan, the next great conflict seemed all but inevitable. Ultimately, the European economic landscape has significantly changed in detrimental and beneficial ways, reconstructing the masses. The calamity of the war resulted in nations lacking resources, which hindered any and all possibilities for global trade. However, the war triggered the mass production of arms and innovative technologies, which governments invested in and aimed to reconstruct their nation back to a great power. This war did not determine who is right. Nobody came out victorious, nobody came out as a winner, nobody took home anything. Oppositely, nations at war suffered unbearable consequences, and great losses. From money, infrastructure, to men, and families, the war took millions from society, and determined who was left, who remained, and who survived, through the cruelty of violence. However, in each respective homeland, a new window was open. This window shed light on the feminist movement, and opened opportunities women did not dare to envision. Amidst the harsh realities of war, women were brought into society, gaining socioeconomic status, and removing decade long barriers that prevented them from participating in the workforce. The aftermath of World War I left an enduring legacy on the world, reshaping demographics, changing social norms, initiating both obstacles and opportunities, for people decades to come.




Works Referenced

Comentários


Os comentários foram desativados.
bottom of page